I would like to make some comments on the extra large helping of food for thought in your latest Newsletter.
I am glad that you have made a firm decision against offering water-based oil colours. Your main reason is the potential durability of such products. I can add from my experience that the new products cannot compete with 'real' oil colours for handling qualities. I have tried both Grumbacher and NorArt 'Edward Munch' colours.
The Grumbacher are very good paints and combine well with real oil colours such as your own and with the normal oil solvents and mediums, but they don't have the smooth flow of normal oils; there is a hint of pastiness about the water-based products as you squeeze from the tube and as you move them around on the picture surface.
The NorArt are worse. At the demonstration (at the AIM Exhibition) the demonstrator said they had a "slightly more buttery consistency than normal oil paints". Dead right! I wonder what brand of butter they used. Their colour list includes 'Moonshine Yellow' which seems an appropriate comment on a company that pretends to base its colours on the usage of Edward Munch. Poor old Edward must be turning in his grave.
I had already learnt about the School of Colour by that time so I was able to make short work of dismissing the commercial twaddle. I took the free samples to give them a try. I ended up giving them to my six year old neighbour (with her mothers permission) whose uninhibited free-flowing buttery style put them to some use during the long hot days of last summer in our back garden.
I am using up the Grumbacher colours (in conjunction with yours) because they are a quality product, with accurate pigment labeling, and I cannot afford to throw away quality paint. My haphazard choice of their colours, in the dark days before I had read 'Blue and Yellow ..', was not too bad: their Thalo Red Rose turned out to be Quinacridone Violet; a couple of semi-duds were Gold Ochre (Yellow Ochre had invited a couple of friend around and were passing themselves off as a Raw Sienna look-alike); Indanthrone Blue is standing in the corner looking rather sheepish - he'll have some use some time when I need to cover a large area cheaply.
A general point about oil colour that needs to be asserted in the face of the current advertising blitz by the big paint companies is that, by and large, oil paint is pleasant to use. Some people may have a specific health problem with solvents (just as some people could have a problem with the dustiness of pastels) but with a well-ventilated room, use of low-odor thinners and (in my case) use of a fan when I am cleaning my brushes in white spirit at the end of a session, oil painting is a delight, and (especially in my case) gives me unlimited opportunities to cover up my mistakes. To judge by the paint companies latest efforts to share our bank accounts you would think that oil painting is a newly-discovered disease.
...it is really only with a book that you can have 'a good read'. A book is a form of technology in its own right, which responds to a human need - and always will do. This brings me to my main point - your books are a good read. They are technical but also readable because of your conversational style - including the pungent comments! Your selling point is your clear style allied with scientific accuracy.
The School of Colour has done for me precisely what you say you wanted it to do - it removed at a stroke my confusion about colour choice and colour mixing. It has given me a clear yardstick to distinguish the gold (lots of it) from the dross (lots of that too) in the art magazines.
I am not surprised that you have received criticism (probably from vested interests). We artists are not noted for our humility and we can be cavalier about the science underpinning art (see the recent comment by the editor of the AIM magazine to the effect that artists concerned about the permanence of their work might not have much worth preserving). As an amateur artist with no obvious axe to grind and thinking myself fairly open-minded, it took some weeks after finding your advertising sample booklet in the AIM magazine before it began to dawn on me that your ideas were not just another set of personal opinions on painting technique but were something radical and essential. I think it will take the symbiotic self-serving magazines and paint companies a lot longer to catch up.
L. Hanaghan |